The differences between Linux hosting and Windows hosting

Date: 29 Sep 2009 Comments: 0

Two of the major operating systems that are normally chosen to run web hosting servers, Linux and Windows, are similar but very different. Choosing between the two can be a burden of faith for the ill informed, so research is essential before finalizing any decision.

Linux hosting is a popular operating system for web hosting that is cheap to install. Windows hosting is also a very popular operating system for web hosting that allows the client to be provided with support that is needed.

There are several differences between the two. The first difference that people generally seem to notice right away is the manner in which the system accesses the server. Linux and Windows both offer the FTP access (File Transfer Protocol ) however, only Linux offers ssh ( secure shell) Windows or Linuxor telnet access. When writing your pages out, “.html” is the file name that Linux hosting is named under, meanwhile with Windows; the file name is “.htm.”

When it comes to security, they both equally have security problems. An age old question has been presented to find out which of these two choices is more secure. Unfortunately, as with anything that is connected to the internet, nothing is completely safe. It has been said that Windows servers are at a higher risk due to the interconnected nature of the programming. This allows for the entire server to be more vulnerable to compromise by an outside source. This, however, is not really the biggest concern. The main part of the security routes back to the service’s administration level, so as long as you have good security there, you are in good shape.

Based solely on price, Linux hosting is cheaper when compared to Windows because most of the software used for Linux hosting is on an open source and as such is free. This also leads back to the security factor, where onlookers have said Linux is viewed by everyone. It is because of this fact that Linux can be seen as more secure, since its source is widely read and its security team is immensely capable of seeing the vulnerability of its programming.

When using Windows, most of the software has to be licensed by Microsoft. These licenses can be pricey, but not overly above Linux pricing. Performance wise, Linux has proven to be more reliable when handling a high amount of processes that run at the same time. Windows however will continue to adapt in an attempt to outdo the current lacking in their programming.

The downside of using a Linux server is that it is not totally compatible with some Microsoft software’s. If you are using certain Microsoft software, even though it is not required, it may be better to use a Windows server just so you can use it to its fully capacity. In an age where a large portion of your software needs are supplied by Windows, it has become increasingly popular to choose them as a server. As time passes, the difference between these two leaders of industry will continue to meet near the middle. The choice then comes down to your personal preference.

Leave a Reply